Ever wonder why MSNBC has been so left leaning since being purchased by ComCast? - Auto-Trend Repairs and Service Information Forums

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

Ever wonder why MSNBC has been so left leaning since being purchased by ComCast?

PowerStroker · UNSTOPPABLE!

Oh Rex, you seem to take some facts, and some falsehoods and invent a giant conspiracy.

MSNBC was liberal leaning long before Comcast took a majority stake in NBC.

Fox was right wing for it's entexistenceance since 1996.

CNN makes an effort to try and stay right in the middle.

The reason there were no anti-trust issues, is because Reagan stopped enforcing the Sherman Anti-trust act, and no president has since. If you think this is bad, remember Exxon Mobil, or Chevron Texaco? Those useseparateseperate companies, but once they merged it seemed to have a very bad effect on oil prices for the rest of us. I believe those Oil giants merged during the Bush administration, yet I've been scouring your site for hours lookingequivalentuivalant thread with you bitching about it... I haven't found it yet, but I'll let you know when I do.

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

If the Sherman Anti-Trust act or similar anti-trust laws are not in play then why did ComCast need government approval to buy MSNBC?

Talking out your ass again? How about all them banks that needed Government approval to buy out other banks when they started dropping like flies? You see PowerStroker the anti-trust mechanisms are still in place, and your party not enforcing the SATA because Regan abandon it does not make it right. Democrats live off the mantra that two wrongs make a right, and that's the cornerstone of the Democratic hypocrisy campaign where as they bitch about something, then do the exact same thing. It's also one of the MAIN reasons I would NEVER vote for a Democrat.

PowerStroker · UNSTOPPABLE!

But Republicans bitch about deficits, but keep on with their wars and billionare tax cuts. Is that any different?

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

Now just hold on one cotton picking minute there PowerStroker!

Take a step back, now take a deep breath and ask yourself this-

What could have GW Bush accomplished should he have been able to carry on his day back on 9/11 when reading the book "My Pet Goat" to the 2nd grade children at the Sarasota elementary school without having to be interrupted with the news of a terrorist attack? What would things have been like for Americans had this not happened? There would have been no wars, and possibly no tax breaks to ease the tensions of people during the war times.

Answer that for me PowerStroker and I think you will have the answer to your question as well. Bush did what Americans wanted him to do in the wake of 9/11 which was to forever change the Middle East. He started with Iraq which paved the way for everything that is today, only Obama does not seem to be handling it as well as Bush did. The tax cuts were because both the American people and the American businesses were going to feel the effects of an all out WAR, a war approved by a majority of Americans at the time and even CONGRESS, which is more than I can say for Obamas patisipation in this illegal war that has not been approved by congress in Libya and soon to be Syria.

So before you start running your flap just know it was cowardly unsanctioned attacks like those on Bill Clintons watch (Black ops) that I believe lead to the 9/11 attacks. And now we have your boy Obama and his administration involved in the same kind of half assed battles in Libya, where as large munitions are getting smuggled out of the country, possibly destined for US soil.

Wake up PowerStroker!

-- Edited by SELLC on Wednesday 24th of August 2011 01:40:00 AM

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

And I should also add PowerStroker, that Clinton could have handled things diffrently to avoid that tragic day on 9/11 too because after the 1993 First World Trade Center Bombing, Osama Bin Laden (OBL) was captured by the Saudis. The Saudis then offered President Clinton extradition of OBL. President Clinton refused the offered extradition of OBL. US Military Asymmetric Warfare Teams shadowed OBL, and continually requested permission to terminate OBL. President Clinton and President Clinton's Whitehouse continually denied permission and recited the US No Assassination Policy. OBL and Al Quada (AQ) accept the Islamic Sanctuary of the Fundamentalist Islamic Taliban Government of Afghanistan. Since OBL and AQ believed that the 1993 First World Trade Center Bombing was a failure since it did not gain International Recognition of Al Quada they started the planning of the 9/11 2001 Attacks, while protected and provided for under Islamic Sanctuary.

As mentioned before about President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies, the US was deaf, dumb and blind. President Clinton's Gutting of the Intelligence Agencies, especially the Executive Branch's Intelligence Agency, the CIA was like President Clinton poking a stick into his own eyes as the CIA are the President's and US Congressional Intelligence Committees eyes on the World.

President Bush rebuilds the US Intelligence Agencies, especially the CIA with the help of his father President Bush (41) as he was also the former Director of the CIA. This takes a long time to replace many of the "Intelligence Assets" at many Nations, that took decades to put into place as credible sources, and months for President Clinton to destroy. So while President Bush is doing this, the 9/11 2001 Attacks occur. Many in the "Community" believe that President Clinton's Gutting of the Intelligence Agencies was due to jealousy of President Bush (41) being on the "inside of the Community" and President Clinton being on the "Outside".

PowerStroker · UNSTOPPABLE!

I just wish George W Bush would have spent more time reading the classified intelligence report that Condi Rice handed him months prior to 911 titled "Usama Bin Laden determined to attack America," and a little less time reading My Pet Goat.

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

*sigh*

Did you fail to read again?

Clinton could have handled things diffrently to avoid that tragic day on 9/11 too because after the 1993 First World Trade Center Bombing, Osama Bin Laden (OBL) was captured by the Saudis. The Saudis then offered President Clinton extradition of OBL. President Clinton refused the offered extradition of OBL

As mentioned before (TWICE BEFORE IN THIS SAME THREAD) about President Clinton's Gutting of the US Intelligence Agencies, the US was deaf, dumb and blind. President Clinton's Gutting of the Intelligence Agencies, especially the Executive Branch's Intelligence Agency, the CIA was like President Clinton poking a stick into his own eyes as the CIA are the President's and US Congressional Intelligence Committees eyes on the World.

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

PowerStroker wrote:

MSNBC was liberal leaning long before Comcast took a majority stake in NBC.

Was it? Or are you thinking about New York Times articles syndicated by MSNBC back in the day?

So how would you rate this forum? Liberal or Conservative?

PowerStroker · UNSTOPPABLE!

This forum is run by a very conservative right wing crank. I like to think my liberalism brings some balance.

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

Unfortunately for you PowerStroker the balance is a little overwhelming due to the amount of screw ups and baggage your boy Obama keeps piling on.

To put it in terms you can understand Ill use a photo.

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

Buuuump!

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

Check out 50 cent being played by the Liberals! LOL

https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/50-cent-nancy-pelosi-capitol-hill

The businessman has been vocal about his feelings about Comcast. He recently called out the company's CEO, Brian L. Roberts, about his handling of the Starz. This is the guy fu**ing up (Power) over at @Comcast for no reason Brian Roberts, mother fu**er look like he been pushed around his whole life, 50 Cent wrote on Instagram. He need to chill out, go to a golf course or sit his a** down some where.

50 Cent either doesn't know who is on his team, or he is being played. LOL, it's sad that 50 cent feels that he must walk in Eminems footsteps by being a flaming liberal! LOL, I hope 50 cent wises up soon because if he really does want to be a business man he better get on board with the Republicans cuz them Liberals will do nothing but bankrupt him, again.

Imagine that! Notice how the supporting MSN link no longer draws up the article in the OP!? This is why these post are so important because liberal media WILL erase and try and re-write history!

Rastus · UNSTOPPABLE!

PowerStroker wrote:
This forum is run by a very conservative right wing crank. I like to think my liberalism brings some balance.

LOL !!!

Let this quote, squash any doubters, of SELLC's allegiance to Mr.Trumpdt !

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

That would almost be funny if it weren't for the fact that I actually did give the ENTIRE Democrat party an un-biased look in 2019...

It wasn't until the Democrats started trying to usurp the sitting POTUS and void our votes in 2016 that I decided that there was no hope for any of them cheaters to garner my vote in 2020.

At this point they can not be trusted, and President Trump himself is having to FIGHT just to keep his legitimate win in 2016 - so how can I blame him for my issues with the financial system - Trump can't even take a shit without some Democrat trying to impeach him for it! It is way out of hand and already the Democrats seem to have forgotten that their policies were widely rejected by the majority of the states in the union. Sore losers really, but the idea that they are secretly trying to discriminate against Trump supporters by banning them, refusing to serve them, and their flash mob tactics they like to call protest are just out of hand... not as much as they were under Obama, but they have been building steam! Especially in cities like NYC, Chicago, and many in California.

I can't stand to see people in NY complain about their politicians when they all vote them in time after time! confuse

-- Edited by SELLC on Sunday 3rd of November 2019 12:08:22 AM

SELLC · CERTIFIED POST WHORE

SELLC wrote:
Ever wonder why there were no anti-trust issues when ComCast (a content distributor) purchased a news outlet (MSNBC).
Ever wonder why MSNBC articles always seem to downplay the serious problems with the Obama Administration and almost seems to work hand in hand with the current Administration?
Well here is your answer!
Quote from "Obama Keeps full vacation day after Libya briefing" article-
"Earlier, Obama spent about an hour at the home of Comcast chief executive Brian Roberts after playing golf with some buddies."
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44222983/ns/politics-white_house/t/obama-keeps-full-vacation-day-after-libya-briefing/ <------ Where's the BEEF!?
It's safe to say that The Obama administration really does have the media in their back pockets! So anything you read on MSNBC can now be considered to be BULLSHIT left wing Democrat propaganda!
Now we all know what REALLY happened to net neutrality! It was KILLED by the Democrats! Next time you watch a live broadcast of President Obama speaking from the White House on your POS $19.99 a month 756K internet plan in FLAWLESS quality, you will know why. Meanwhile everything else lags and is not even worth watching.

Ah-hem.. Anyone know what happened to the text in that link above? Anyone... Anyone... Buller? Buller?

Never mind... Nothing to see here, move along now...

Shawnee_B · FAR BEYOND DRIVEN

Yes MSNBC is VERY partisan and far left leaning.

Fox is getting that way.

CNN stays in the middle? What, between extreme far left and communist? bwahaahaa