Queen Elizabeth II has died, Buckingham Palace announces

SELLC wrote:

---

1.Which brings us to the next chapter...

2. Already many in England have switched to "RIP Her Majesty the Queen... Long live the King!"

3. Just like that!

4. One can't help but wonder what this will mean for England, as a new King takes the throne. It's going to profoundly shake up the political landscape in the region (UK), if not all over the world.

---

R1. We're all born to die some day, it seems that the Queen wasn't seeing the same doctors as Henry Kissinger...

R2. Yes, I've forgotten the names in the family, but I think that "Prince Charles" can't become King, as he divorced the Lady Dianna yadda, yadda. But who cares anyway ?...

R3. Here one minute, gone the next !

R4. No, not at all...Everything will stay as it is imo.

* You must remember here, that these folks have German ancestry, & they "had" to change their name to the "House of Windsor" after WW-II...- Just to keep the tensions down locally of course...

And don't forget that the UK is not so peaceful, with the Irish having their own "civil war" going on, though we don't hear too much about it...Perhaps that's why a civil war state-side is being flaunted in the press, as a distraction to other real matters going on in the world ???...It's worked in the UK for years !

Also, according to John Warner IV, she "was" top-dog amongst all the Royal families throughout Europe, since they were buying arms from the US-of-A, which is why he was there in the first place.

The Anlgo / American take-over of the world is well underway, this will continue.

Prince Harry's older brother is Prince William... his name is not as recognizable outside the UK because unlike Harry, Prince William takes his duty to service seriously with a cool level head. In other words, he's not out there acting an ass for attention... and why should he? He is currently next in line to be the King of England!

With regards to (now) King Charles III's brother... well, my opinon would be considered chauvinistic and repulsive in todays society... so I will just say he didn't put a gun to anyones head and I'm sure the girl he fucked knew who he was, and if she didn't she soon found out because she milked the Royal Family for a good sum of money! Guess that would make her a... what would that make her Rastus? A woman that takes money for sex? What do they call that? I can't think of the name, sorry.

I think the term you may have heard in the other threads was "Bimbo's", which is their "call-sign" on their Webcrawlers pod-cast... or at least it was.

Completely different than what you are thinking in that regard, but at the same time I get that you know what I'm talking about.

I have never paid directly for sex... sure, it always cost you in some way... dinner, kids, marriage, and other things but that's not the same.

And we can never forget about the Miami caper! 

R1 - Yeah, women are dangerous creatures! But the institution it seems is becoming indiscriminate with same sex unions... I think it takes away from the sanctity of marriage, but that doesn't mean other people shouldn't be able to... I think that's what sanctity means, you have the option - but you refrain due to beliefs. Some say a lot of same sex unions are to game the system, and I can see that being true! HOWEVER, the same could be said for men/woman unions, at least in terms of getting illegals their green card or other reasons... The kick-back is it could all blow up in their faces and either or could be sitting in divorce court facing just what you have said above! It makes me wonder if same sex unions see more of an even 50/50 split in divorce proceedings? Rather than the typical 65/35 for woman/men respectively. That would be very interesting to see!

Brandee said I need not worry about divorce... she said she'd just cut off my dick! 

R2D2- Amen brother! Truer words have never been posted! Felt like that movie Oceans Eleven... I'm not the first they got either because they had that game down TIGHT! They were professionals, no doubt!

I dunno Rastus... I can think of a few women I wouldn't mind impregnating... LOL, and that's even knowing the cold hard truth about what you said above...

The more things change, the more they stay the same... When I raised my kids every single bit of help was appreciated because it gets dicey raising kids! I guess if you're going to knock one up it's got to be a good one. 

Keep trying to tell myself there is no need for any more kids, or women for that matter... I think I have a problem. Mick Jagger is enabling me... You see these movie stars and rock stars knocking up five or six different women... it really is a sickness, being a man.

I think honestly a lot more needs to be done to ensure families can make that 18 year stretch... it's so very important! Whatever that cost is probably worth it considering the alternative is the human race going extinct. A lot of people today put off having kids until they get so old they have to use treatments like IVF! Not many people can afford that, so I'd think a majority of women who wait just miss the window. 

If it's truly a numbers game as you have suggested, it's not looking good and America needs to get back to making babies!

Yeah... I'm just some old mechanic, not some rock superstar or a movie-star. 

I should have played my guitar on the MTV!