Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Auto-Trend Repairs and Service Information Forums -> Money, Business, Technology and Politics -> Who should be responsible for paying back tariffs collected after todays SCOTUS ruling?
Post Info TOPIC: Who should be responsible for paying back tariffs collected after todays SCOTUS ruling?
Who should have to pay back tariffs? [2 vote(s)]

The companies that get refunds since they already collected.
50.0%
The Government
50.0%
Chi-NA!
0.0%
Obama's Interstellar Aliens
0.0%
Nobody!
0.0%
Shawnee_B


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5005
Date:
RE: Who should be responsible for paying back tariffs collected after todays SCOTUS ruling?
Permalink  

PowerStroker wrote:

I'm going to heaven too, and I think they'll have fewer questions for me when I get there.

As far as the bigotry, you can reference your own posts here about gays, transgender people, Mexicans, and black people.

 Good luck. You are a blasphemer.



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
Shawnee_B


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5005
Date:
Permalink  

PowerStroker wrote:

Pharmaceutical puberty blockers and hormone treatments are not sex change operations. I'm not aware of any current elected officials in my state that are pedophiles, promoted sex changes on children, or were involved in the missing 9 billion either. In fact, they are investigating and prosecuting the people involved in the fraud.



-- Edited by PowerStroker on Friday 27th of February 2026 01:05:00 PM

 It's mutilation of their body regardless, against God's plan for his children. He wanted little boys to grow up as men, not grow tits and have no facial hair, no testerone. 



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
Shawnee_B


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5005
Date:
Permalink  

PowerStroker wrote:

Nothing, we just don't share your bigotry.

 It's not bigotry, it's Gods word.



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
Shawnee_B


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5005
Date:
Permalink  

PowerStroker wrote:

What would Jesus say about your comments? I don't recall any passage in the Bible where he ever uttered anything like what you say.

 He didn't because it was a given. Gods word is forever, not you freaks whims.



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
PowerStroker


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6857
Date:
Permalink  

Shawnee_B wrote:

 These very bigoted people wrote down Gods word, so you are calling God a bigot.

No, I just don't have full faith in the bigoted people of the day who allegedly wrote it down. God spoke directly with Moses and gave him 10 commandments to share with mankind. Homosexuality wasn't mentioned in them. If it was such a big deal, you'd think there would have been an eleventh commandment about it. Then, a long time later when he sent his son, Jesus made no mention of it either. It seems it's not such a big deal to them otherwise they would have specifically spoken on the issue. 

I know there are passages in the Bible that speak negatively about it, but to be a Christian is to follow the teachings of Jesus, he made no mention of it. It seems to me, that the true blasphemy, is to attribute ones bigotry to a person who never took a stand on the issue either way. The verse in Matthew you reference as a New Testament justification for bigotry is vague at best. To use it as justification for bigotry, runs contrary to all of the other teachings of Jesus we know.

And straight Christian people get STD's too, so that's a junk argument. Just ask Kid Rock.



__________________

https://djtrumplibrary.com/
Shawnee_B


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5005
Date:
Permalink  

PowerStroker wrote:
Shawnee_B wrote:

 These very bigoted people wrote down Gods word, so you are calling God a bigot.

No, I just don't have full faith in the bigoted people of the day who allegedly wrote it down. God spoke directly with Moses and gave him 10 commandments to share with mankind. Homosexuality wasn't mentioned in them. If it was such a big deal, you'd think there would have been an eleventh commandment about it. Then, a long time later when he sent his son, Jesus made no mention of it either. It seems it's not such a big deal to them otherwise they would have specifically spoken on the issue. 

I know there are passages in the Bible that speak negatively about it, but to be a Christian is to follow the teachings of Jesus, he made no mention of it. It seems to me, that the true blasphemy, is to attribute ones bigotry to a person who never took a stand on the issue either way. The verse in Matthew you reference as a New Testament justification for bigotry is vague at best. To use it as justification for bigotry, runs contrary to all of the other teachings of Jesus we know.

And straight Christian people get STD's too, so that's a junk argument. Just ask Kid Rock.

 Go march in a gay parade then. I gave you some links, check them out, it explains it how Christians see it. 



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
PowerStroker


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6857
Date:
Permalink  

I am a Christian, and it's not how I see it.

Perhaps the son is more progressive than the father. If that's the case, and if the saving of our souls depends on accepting the son as our lord and savior... Wouldn't it behoove us all to follow the teachings of the son and to live by his example?

__________________

https://djtrumplibrary.com/
SELLC


CERTIFIED POST WHORE

Status: Offline
Posts: 16939
Date:
Permalink  

If you're a Christian, you certainly know what it means to omit certain truths? Right?

Is the reason you do this so often yet another sin? One of vanity? Because why else would you omit important material facts so often? Because they serve to make you look like an idiot?

It's like they say, some of the worst sinners will be at church every Sunday.



__________________

What is to give light must endure burning -- Viktor Frankl

 

 
Shawnee_B


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5005
Date:
Permalink  

PowerStroker wrote:
Shawnee_B wrote:

 These very bigoted people wrote down Gods word, so you are calling God a bigot.

No, I just don't have full faith in the bigoted people of the day who allegedly wrote it down. God spoke directly with Moses and gave him 10 commandments to share with mankind. Homosexuality wasn't mentioned in them. If it was such a big deal, you'd think there would have been an eleventh commandment about it. Then, a long time later when he sent his son, Jesus made no mention of it either. It seems it's not such a big deal to them otherwise they would have specifically spoken on the issue. 

I know there are passages in the Bible that speak negatively about it, but to be a Christian is to follow the teachings of Jesus, he made no mention of it. It seems to me, that the true blasphemy, is to attribute ones bigotry to a person who never took a stand on the issue either way. The verse in Matthew you reference as a New Testament justification for bigotry is vague at best. To use it as justification for bigotry, runs contrary to all of the other teachings of Jesus we know.

And straight Christian people get STD's too, so that's a junk argument. Just ask Kid Rock.

 The seven deadly sins are not in the commandments either. What's your point. It's all Gods word, not just the 10 commandments. 



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
Shawnee_B


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5005
Date:
Permalink  

SELLC wrote:

If you're a Christian, you certainly know what it means to omit certain truths? Right?

Is the reason you do this so often yet another sin? One of vanity? Because why else would you omit important material facts so often? Because they serve to make you look like an idiot?

It's like they say, some of the worst sinners will be at church every Sunday.

 Now he will say "vanity isn't in the 10 commandments"  



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
PowerStroker


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 6857
Date:
Permalink  

All I'm saying is that a Christian follows the teachings of Jesus, and nowhere in the teachings of Jesus is there justification for bigotry.

__________________

https://djtrumplibrary.com/
Shawnee_B


UNSTOPPABLE!

Status: Offline
Posts: 5005
Date:
Permalink  

PowerStroker wrote:

All I'm saying is that a Christian follows the teachings of Jesus, and nowhere in the teachings of Jesus is there justification for bigotry.

 You run with that skippy



__________________
Drive it like you stole it
«First  <  1 2 | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
Auto-Trend Repairs and Service Information Forums -> Money, Business, Technology and Politics -> Who should be responsible for paying back tariffs collected after todays SCOTUS ruling?


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard